Must the Empowered Committee Consider All Applications Forwarded Under a Government Policy Within the Policy Parameters and a Time Frame? Judgment Affirms Existing Precedent; Mandates Time-Bound, Policy-Based Individual Adjudication—Binding on Subordinate Courts

The court clarified that every application forwarded under the relevant government scheme must be considered afresh by the Empowered Committee,

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Does Regularization Entitle Previously Contractual or Temporary Employees to Revised Pay Scales? Himachal Pradesh High Court Reaffirms and Clarifies the Application of Revised Pay Rules, 2022

The Himachal Pradesh High Court reaffirms the applicability of the Revised Pay Rules, 2022 to employees regularized after the rules’

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Can a Public Sector Undertaking Delay Implementation of a Government-Notified Pension Revision Once Adopted, Due to Financial Constraints?

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has reaffirmed that once a government notification regarding pension revision is formally adopted by a

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Can Delegation of DDO Powers in Government Schools Be Lawfully Based Upon Seniority—and Can Such Delegation, Once Made to a Junior, Be Rescinded in Favour of a Senior Lecturer? (Precedent Value: High Court Binding)

A single-judge bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court has clarified that the delegation of Drawing and Disbursing Officer (DDO)

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Himachal Pradesh

(Existing Precedent Upheld – Clarification on Procedural Compliance for Policy-Linked Applications; Binding Authority in Himachal Pradesh)

The Himachal Pradesh High Court reaffirms that all individual applications forwarded during the currency of a notified government scheme must

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Does Regularization Qualify Previously Contractual Employees for Post-Regularization Benefits Under the Revised Pay Rules, 2022, Despite Prior Employment Status? — Himachal Pradesh High Court Affirms Supreme Principle on Equal Pay for Equal Work

The Himachal Pradesh High Court reaffirms that once contractual employees are regularized, they are entitled to benefits under the Revised

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Does an Admitted Decision by a PSU’s Board to Adopt State Government Pension Revision Create an Enforceable Right for Employees to Arrears and Revised Payments Even if Implementation Is Delayed?

The Himachal Pradesh High Court affirms that, where a PSU (HRTC) admits and adopts State Government pension revision through a

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Can Bail Be Granted Where the Alleged Involvement of the Accused Relates to Abetment or Cruelty Preceding Death by Hanging? — Affirmation of a Stringent Approach Under BNS, 2023

The High Court of Jharkhand reaffirms a restrictive approach in bail matters involving allegations of participation by in-laws in abetment

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Jharkhand

Can Government Medical Officers Be Denied NOC for Pursuing Fellowships at Recognized Institutions? Precedent Clarification on Administrative Discretion and Undertaking-Based Relief

Orissa High Court holds that administrative decisions refusing No Objection Certificates (NOCs) are subject to judicial review where no public

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | Orissa High Court

When Does a Writ Petition Become Infructuous Due to Efflux of Time?

Courts may dismiss writ petitions as infructuous when circumstances change or relief is no longer required, upon a statement by

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Uttarakhand

Can Conviction under Section 395 IPC Stand When Fewer than Five Persons Are Tried? High Court Affirms Mandatory Requirement of IPC Section 391

The Uttarakhand High Court reiterates that conviction for dacoity under Section 395 IPC cannot be sustained unless the essential threshold

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Uttarakhand

Can Conviction for Dacoity Stand if Fewer Than Five Accused Are Tried? Uttarakhand High Court Clarifies the Mandatory Ingredients of Section 395 IPC

The Uttarakhand High Court has held that conviction under Section 395 IPC (dacoity) is legally unsustainable when only four persons

READ MORE
October 24, 2025 | High Court of Uttarakhand
LawSikho Footer
Get In Touch
Address
Registered Office LawSikho, Space Creattors Heights, 3rd floor,
Landmark Cyber Park, Golf Course Extension, Sector 67,
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122102
Address
Branch Office 132A Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Road, Rashbehari Outlet, Kolkata - 700026
F2, Sector F, HIG Colony, Indore, Madhya Pradesh 452012
91 Springboard, Sector 63, Noida A-130, A Block, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301
Phone +91 80474 86192 / +91 9818678383
Between 10.00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. (IST)
(Please include +91 prefix while calling)
Email
Chat
Chat with our counsellor from 9 AM to 9 PM (IST)

footerform Do You Have Any Queries?

By submitting this form, I agree to LawSikho and its representatives contacting me through call, SMS, email or WhatsApp even if I am registered under NDNC. I also agree that I have read and understood the Terms and conditions and agree to abide by the same
Logo
ADDICTIVE LEARNING TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
(Formerly Addictive Learning Technology Private Limited)
CIN: L74110HR2017PLC118029
GST: 06AAQCA0212K1ZV
LawSikho, Space Creattors Heights, 3rd floor,
Landmark Cyber Park, Golf Course Extension, Sector 67,
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122102
© 2011 - 2025 ADDICTIVE LEARNING TECHNOLOGY LIMITED. All rights reserved.