Does a Trial Court Have to Issue Bailable Warrants Instead of Non-Bailable Warrants When Accused Are Joined via Section 319 CrPC Based on Evidence, and Multiple Investigations Have Not Led to Chargesheeting? – High Court Clarifies Discretion and Interim Protection

High Court affirms, relying on Inder Mohan Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal, that courts possess discretion to issue bailable warrants

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | High Court Of Rajasthan

Does a Bail Application Merit Rejection When the Victim’s Testimony Fully Supports Prosecution in Serious Offences Under POCSO Act and B.N.S.?

The Jharkhand High Court reaffirmed that bail must be refused where the prosecutrix’s testimony fully supports grave allegations of gang

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | High Court of Jharkhand

When Can a Court Dismiss an Appeal for Non-Compliance with Office Objections?

A clarified affirmation by the High Court of Karnataka that failure to comply with office objections, despite repeated opportunities and

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | High Court of Karnataka

Does Non-Compliance With Office Objections Mandate Dismissal of an Appeal Under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894? Upholding Procedure: Binding Precedent on Dismissal for Office Objection Non-Compliance

The High Court of Karnataka reaffirmed that failure to comply with office objections, even after repeated adjournments and clear warnings,

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | High Court of Karnataka

Can a Bank Classify a Cash Credit Account as NPA Solely for Low Turnover? Orissa High Court Reaffirms the Primacy of RBI’s 90-Day “Out of Order” Norm—Binding Authority for Asset Classification Disputes

Orissa High Court holds that banks cannot classify a borrower’s cash credit account as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) based purely

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | Orissa High Court

When, if Ever, Can the Sub-Registrar or State Authorities Determine the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe Status of a Caste Not Expressly Included in the Presidential Notification? — Orissa High Court Reaffirms the Finality of Presidential Orders as Binding Authority

High Court clarifies that the determination of whether a caste or sub-caste falls within the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | Orissa High Court

Does Prolonged Detention of a Seized Vehicle Under the Odisha Minor Minerals Concession Rules Without Timely Initiation of Confiscation or Penalty Proceedings Violate Constitutional and Statutory Rights?

The Orissa High Court clarified that, while seizure by a duly authorized police officer under Rule 51 of the OMMC

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | Orissa High Court

Does the Orissa High Court Judgment in FAO No. 141 of 2020 Clarify or Modify Compensation Principles in Railway Accident Claims, and Can It Be Cited as Binding Authority for Similar Matters?

The Orissa High Court held in FAO No. 141 of 2020 that the appellant is entitled to compensation and specified

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | Orissa High Court

Does the Mere Disposal of Multiple Writ Petitions Without Detailed Orders Create a Binding Legal Precedent Under Indian Law? [Precedent Followed, No New Legal Principle Laid Down]

The Orissa High Court, through a brief oral order, disposed of a batch of writ petitions without prescribing new legal

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | Orissa High Court

Can the State Adopt a “Pick and Choose” Approach in Land Acquisition Appeals? Bombay High Court Reiterates Equal Treatment Principle and Clarifies Compensation for Dry and Irrigated Lands

State authorities cannot challenge enhancement of compensation for some landowners while acquiescing in awards for others in comparable circumstances. The

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | Bombay High Court

When Are Acquiring Authorities Barred From “Pick and Choose” Appeals in Land Acquisition Matters? – Precedential Limits on Discriminatory Challenges to Compensation Awards

Bombay High Court upholds bar on State adopting a discriminatory “pick and choose” approach in challenging compensation awards under the

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | Bombay High Court

Can the State “Pick and Choose” Compensation Challenged in Land Acquisition Appeals? Scope of Discrimination, Award Calculation, and Binding Guidelines After Bombay High Court 2025 Ruling

The Bombay High Court has affirmed that once the State or its agency accepts a compensation award for some landholders,

READ MORE
October 23, 2025 | Bombay High Court
LawSikho Footer
Get In Touch
Address
Registered Office LawSikho, Space Creattors Heights, 3rd floor,
Landmark Cyber Park, Golf Course Extension, Sector 67,
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122102
Address
Branch Office 132A Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Road, Rashbehari Outlet, Kolkata - 700026
F2, Sector F, HIG Colony, Indore, Madhya Pradesh 452012
91 Springboard, Sector 63, Noida A-130, A Block, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301
Phone +91 80474 86192 / +91 9818678383
Between 10.00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. (IST)
(Please include +91 prefix while calling)
Email
Chat
Chat with our counsellor from 9 AM to 9 PM (IST)

footerform Do You Have Any Queries?

By submitting this form, I agree to LawSikho and its representatives contacting me through call, SMS, email or WhatsApp even if I am registered under NDNC. I also agree that I have read and understood the Terms and conditions and agree to abide by the same
Logo
ADDICTIVE LEARNING TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
(Formerly Addictive Learning Technology Private Limited)
CIN: L74110HR2017PLC118029
GST: 06AAQCA0212K1ZV
LawSikho, Space Creattors Heights, 3rd floor,
Landmark Cyber Park, Golf Course Extension, Sector 67,
Gurgaon, Haryana - 122102
© 2011 - 2025 ADDICTIVE LEARNING TECHNOLOGY LIMITED. All rights reserved.