The Punjab and Haryana High Court reaffirms that a writ petition may be withdrawn when the petitioner has received the relief sought—here, post-receipt of compensation—with the proceedings being dismissed as withdrawn; this sets a practical, binding precedent on withdrawal procedure in writ jurisdiction, providing clear authority to subordinate courts and petitioners.
Summary
| Category | Data |
|---|---|
| Case Name | CWP/15044/2025 of GURMAIL KAUR Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS |
| CNR | PHHC010834592025 |
| Date of Registration | 21-05-2025 |
| Decision Date | 30-10-2025 |
| Disposal Nature | DISMISSED |
| Judgment Author | MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA |
| Court | High Court of Punjab and Haryana |
| Bench | Single Bench (MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA) |
| Precedent Value | Binding on subordinate courts within the Punjab & Haryana High Court jurisdiction |
| Type of Law | Procedural (Writ – Withdrawal) |
| Ratio Decidendi |
Where a petitioner receives the compensation or substantive relief that formed the basis of their writ petition, it is open to them to withdraw the writ petition. The Court, upon such request and acknowledgment on record, will dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. This ensures procedural finality and avoids unnecessary judicial time being spent on settled claims. The withdrawal also disposes of any pending interlocutory applications. |
| Facts as Summarised by the Court |
Counsel for the petitioner stated on record that the compensation amount has been received. Based on this, the counsel sought withdrawal of the writ petition, leading the court to dismiss it as withdrawn. |
Practical Impact
| Category | Impact |
|---|---|
| Binding On | All subordinate courts within the Punjab & Haryana High Court jurisdiction |
| Persuasive For | Other High Courts and similar writ proceedings |
What’s New / What Lawyers Should Note
- Explicit procedural confirmation that writ petitions may be withdrawn upon full satisfaction of claim by the petitioner.
- The order will record that the petition is dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the petitioner, ensuring clear judicial closure.
- All pending applications (if any) tied to the writ will also be disposed of simultaneously.
- Lawyers must ensure to place on record the fact of satisfaction/settlement to facilitate smooth withdrawal.
Summary of Legal Reasoning
- The Court noted the counsel’s statement that the compensation amount, which was the subject of the proceedings, had been received in full by the petitioner.
- Upon this statement, the counsel expressed a wish to withdraw the writ petition.
- Accepting this request, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and also disposed of all pending applications.
- The judicial act underscores economy in court processes—once a petitioner’s grievance is fully redressed, further adjudication is unnecessary.
Arguments by the Parties
Petitioner:
- The petitioner has already received the compensation amount that formed the basis of the petition.
- Sought permission to withdraw the writ petition.
Respondent:
- No arguments of the respondent recorded in the order.
Factual Background
The writ petition was initially filed seeking redress concerning compensation. During the course of proceedings, the petitioner received the compensation amount sought. Upon confirmation of receipt, the petitioner’s counsel moved for withdrawal of the petition, leading the Court to formally dismiss the petition as withdrawn and close all related pending applications.
Statutory Analysis
The judgment involves the procedural aspect of withdrawal in writ proceedings but does not discuss interpretation or application of any statutory provision in detail. The focus is on court practice upon satisfaction of claim by the petitioner in a writ petition.
Alert Indicators
- ✔ Precedent Followed – The order reiterates the existing procedural law/practice for withdrawal of writ petitions on satisfaction of claim.