The Orissa High Court has held that where an accused has already applied for the requisite licence and the application
The Madras High Court affirms, in line with the Full Bench judgment in S. Ganapathy v. N. Senthilvel, that appeals
The judgment upholds the principle that when the Supreme Court has affirmed an interim order of bail in an SC/ST
The High Court reaffirms that a writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh with better particulars, without
Punjab and Haryana High Court affirms that the right to speedy trial under Article 21 can justify grant of bail
Orissa High Court holds that Assistant Settlement Officers (ASOs) have no jurisdiction under the Orissa Survey and Settlement Act, 1958
The Orissa High Court expressly confirms that Tahasildars must register applications for mutation as a matter of legal duty and
The Orissa High Court categorically clarifies that Assistant Settlement Officers (ASOs) exercising powers under the Orissa Survey and Settlement Act,
The Orissa High Court has reaffirmed that a Tahasildar is duty-bound to register any mutation application presented before them and
Punjab & Haryana High Court holds that long incarceration and slow trial, not attributable to the accused, can dilute Section
The Court held that when interim bail granted by the High Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is affirmed by the
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has clarified that upon satisfactory compliance with investigation requirements after an order granting anticipatory