The High Court of Sikkim reaffirms that when parties are bound by an arbitration clause, High Courts should exercise extreme
The Madras High Court reiterates that any deviation from the specific procedural requirements of Clause 33 of the Bipartite Settlement—in
The Madras High Court held that when an employee is allowed to continue in service for an extended period beyond
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has affirmed that when the primary FIR has been quashed following a settlement, ancillary
The judgment reiterates that absent ouster, prejudice, or detriment to a co-owner’s interest, a co-owner not in exclusive possession cannot
The High Court clarified that, in the factual matrix of this case, an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC
When a retired employee approaches the court for retrospective conferment of daily wage status and regularization of service long after
The High Court reaffirmed that interference in appeals against acquittal is permitted only if the judgment is perverse, based on
The Calcutta High Court clarifies that in cases of contractual employment, unless the terms of the contract or applicable rules
The Punjab & Haryana High Court reaffirms that once the main FIR is quashed on settlement, ancillary criminal proceedings solely
The Court reaffirmed that a co-owner not in exclusive possession cannot obtain an injunction against another co-owner’s use or improvement
The Uttarakhand High Court reiterates, following its recent precedent, that businesses whose GST registration was cancelled can seek revocation by