The court reaffirmed that the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should not be exercised when an adequate and efficacious statutory
The Chhattisgarh High Court held that regularization of ad-hoc/contingency employees is to operate prospectively, not retrospectively, and refusal to grant
Gauhati High Court affirms that strict compliance with Section 25F is mandatory for valid retrenchment or closure under Sections 25F,
The Andhra Pradesh High Court reaffirmed that delay in lodging an FIR does not inherently defeat a motor accident compensation
Chhattisgarh High Court upholds the established Supreme Court position that seized vehicles should not be kept in police custody for
The Chhattisgarh High Court re-examines the threshold for establishing the victim’s minority under the POCSO Act and clarifies that vague,
Where an authority complies with the High Court’s directive to consider an employee’s claim, and issues a speaking order, the
The High Court clarifies that once the underlying grievance—here, the issuance of a community certificate—is redressed during the pendency of
The Gauhati High Court has affirmed the constitutional validity of the proviso to Rule 5(5) of the Assam Secretariat Service
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh reiterates that interference with a trial court’s acquittal is justified only where the findings
The Chhattisgarh High Court reaffirms that suppression of material facts by a litigant justifies dismissal of writ petitions and imposition
Regularization of service can only be prospective and not retrospective; the court upholds established Supreme Court precedent restricting retrospective seniority