The Calcutta High Court answers “no,” reaffirming that normal contradictions and incomplete recovery of weapons do not defeat convictions when
The Calcutta High Court affirms that minor contradictions, inquest irregularities, or non-recovery of weapons do not automatically undermine convictions under
The Madras High Court reaffirms procedural norms by allowing withdrawal of a writ petition with endorsement and directing petitioners to
The Calcutta High Court affirms the power to dispose appeals on settlement terms, add previously non-partied respondents who have affirmed
Calcutta High Court reaffirms that where relief has been granted by respondents, a writ petition may be summarily disposed of
Reaffirming that normal discrepancies, inquest limitations, and minor investigative omissions do not undermine murder and grievous‐hurt convictions; acquitting those not
Calcutta High Court affirms that minor contradictions, preliminary inquest reports and post-mortem meal-time estimations do not derail convictions; binding authority
Summary Category Data Case Name WP(C)/33311/2024 of MANJULATA MOHANTA Vs STATE OF ODISHA CNR ODHC010927152024 Decision Date 18-08-2025 Disposal
High Court Reaffirms Exhaustion of Statutory Remedies Before Exercising Writ Jurisdiction in Eviction Proceedings under Section 12(1) of the O.P.L.E.
Patna High Court dismisses petition for non-prosecution; underscores the procedural necessity of appearance or a formal adjournment request Summary
High Court permits withdrawal of quashing petition, reaffirming inherent discretionary power under Section 482 CrPC; persuasive authority for lower courts
Calcutta High Court upholds established bail principles, binding on subordinate courts, affirming that overwhelming material and gravity of charges justify