The Uttarakhand High Court affirms the statutory obligation of expeditious summary trials under Section 143(3), NI Act, and uses its
High Court reaffirms that omission to put specific incriminating evidence under Section 313 CrPC is a serious irregularity warranting quashing
Madras High Court Affirms Established Article 227 Procedure for Dismissal in Absence of Petitioners Summary Category Data Case Name
Court Reaffirms Procedural Norm That Failure to Represent Warrants Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Summary Category Data Case Name CRP(MD)Nos.2421 &
Court confirms that absence of the petitioner warrants dismissal for non-prosecution but grants a one-month window for restoration Summary
Madras High Court upholds discretionary bail standards—granting relief in small-scale cigarette sales to minors, reaffirming P.K. Shaji guidelines; binding on
The Uttarakhand High Court upholds the established principle that writ petitions lacking any surviving relief must be dismissed as infructuous;
Permitting administrative withdrawal of Criminal Miscellaneous Applications — petition disposed as withdrawn; no substantive examination conducted Summary Category Data
Summary Category Data Case Name Cr.A(DB)/1343/2018 of BHUNESHWAR MAHTO Vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND CNR JHHC010381122018 Date of Registration
High Court Reaffirms Requirement of Reliable Eye-Witness Accounts and Forensic Corroboration Before Upholding a Conviction Summary Category Data Case
Affirming established practice: disposal of writ petitions as academic when relief granted via state affidavit — utility in service-law disputes
Bombay High Court holds they cannot, reaffirming that prima facie specific role/ingredients are required to invoke the statutory bail bar;