The Jharkhand High Court holds that vague pleas of oral gift lacking date, time, place and witness particulars are insufficient;
Yes—Madras High Court affirms Supreme Court precedents in Roop Kumar and R. Janakiraman that Sections 91/92 do not bar proof
Single-Judge High Court Ruling Affirms Established Procedure to Dismiss Unrepresented Writ Petitions, Creating Binding Authority on Procedural Compliance Summary
The High Court reaffirmed that non-appearance at two consecutive hearings warrants dismissal of a writ petition for non-prosecution, upholding existing
Summary Category Data Case Name EX.P./571/2024 of RAJ KUMAR AND ORS Vs STATE OF HP AND ORS CNR HPHC010210412024
High Court of Meghalaya Allows Withdrawal of WP(C) No. 85/2025 by Mutual Consent, Setting a Procedural Benchmark for Consent Withdrawals
High Court of Meghalaya dismisses challenge to compensation entitlement, affirming that Article 226 writs cannot supplant statutory remedies under the
Yes – the High Court disposed MC[WP(C)] 48/2024 in view of its decision in WP(C) 78/2024 dated 18-08-2025, upholding the
High Court affirms existing bail principles, clarifying criteria under the new BNSS provision; binding on all subordinate courts in West
High Court dismisses writ petition by an Anganwari worker absent since 2015, reaffirming limits on Article 226 intervention in service
Court Declines Writ, Treats Defective Notice as Prescribed Form Kha, and Directs Time-Bound Appeal with Interim Protection Summary Category
Orissa High Court affirms discretionary power under Article 226 to allow petitioners to withdraw and refile with better particulars