Clarification of Rule 4 proviso of the Odisha Aided Educational Institutions Employees’ GPF Rules, 1983 as binding authority for GPF
Orissa High Court reaffirms that probate is not required for wills executed in former princely state territories under Section 57
Upholding Supreme Court’s Strict Approach Refusing Condonation of Excessive Delay by Government Entities Summary Category Data Case Name WA/114/2024
The Orissa High Court affirms that challenged orders in OEA appeals cannot be reopened by civil suit in absence of
Supreme Court precedents and State policies upheld: SSRB must reconsider premature release after one year with fresh recommendations; binding authority
Reaffirming that only biennial revision lies with the DLVC, while percentage enhancement is a Collector’s power under Rule 40(2) –
Madras High Court affirms that deposit of title deeds operates as a valid mortgage under Section 58(f) of the Transfer
Calcutta HC upholds sanctity of RDSO Quality Assurance Plans, distinguishes APAR Industries, confirming that deviation from an approved QAP attracts
Orissa High Court holds that DLVC must adhere to Rule 37 constitution and can only fix biennial benchmark valuations, with
Calcutta High Court affirms that unchallenged public documents issued during the deceased’s lifetime create prima facie proof of matrimonial status
Clarification of “terrorist act” under UAPA Section 15; upholds narrow interpretation, offers persuasive authority for bail in UAPA cases
The Orissa High Court reaffirms that, under Section 11(6)/(6-A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, its role is confined