The Calcutta High Court dismissed as infructuous a writ petition challenging an order under Section 144(2) CrPC, holding that passage
Patna High Court has reiterated that blacklisting orders by quasi-judicial authorities must contain detailed reasons addressing the affected party’s contentions,
The Calcutta High Court has reaffirmed that challenging multiple separate assessment orders via a single writ petition is not maintainable,
The Delhi High Court reaffirms that “change in circumstances” under Section 127 CrPC includes rise in respondent’s pension and increase
The Punjab & Haryana High Court reaffirms that refusal of parole cannot rest only on generic fears of crime or
The Punjab & Haryana High Court affirms that in cases where an accused, previously declared a proclaimed person due to
The Punjab & Haryana High Court reaffirms that writ jurisdiction is not to be invoked when alternative efficacious statutory remedies—such
The High Court holds that significant delay in filing appeals for enhanced compensation under land acquisition can be condoned if
Reiterating the settled legal position, the Court holds that every mandatory procedural step prescribed under Section 82 CrPC (including public
The Punjab & Haryana High Court reaffirms that when the accused has fully cooperated and custodial interrogation is not needed,
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana clarified that even in commercial quantity NDPS cases, extended pre-trial detention and absence
The High Court clarifies that parole may not be denied merely on the apprehension that a convict may re-offend, unless