The Orissa High Court held that compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, must be awarded where statutory
The Bombay High Court has categorically held that State authorities cannot selectively challenge Reference Court awards, reaffirming the Supreme Court
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, holds that the acquiring authority cannot adopt a “pick and choose” approach—accepting compensation awards
The High Court held that the imposition of ₹15,00,000 per course as a security deposit by Kumaon University, contrary to
Uttarakhand High Court mandates timely release of admitted post-retirement benefits despite financial crunch, upholding settled law; reinforces binding obligation of
The Telangana High Court clarifies bail eligibility in offences involving vehicle damage and drunken driving when no injury is caused,
The High Court holds that blanket administrative orders restraining persons from attending religious celebrations on ‘public order’ grounds violate fundamental
The Madras High Court reaffirmed that an appeal can be dismissed for non-prosecution in the absence of representation for the
Bombay High Court holds that a state or its instrumentality cannot challenge enhanced compensation in some land acquisition matters while
The Bombay High Court reiterates that government or its instrumentalities cannot “pick and choose” which similar compensation awards to appeal
The Bombay High Court has held that the State or its instrumentalities cannot adopt a “pick and choose” approach in
The Bombay High Court, reaffirming settled law, held that State instrumentalities cannot adopt a pick-and-choose approach by accepting enhanced compensation