Is Power Supplied Before Combined‐Cycle COD by an Open‐Cycle Gas Turbine “Firm Power” Under Electricity Regulations Despite a PPA Definition to the Contrary?

 

Summary

Category Data
Court Supreme Court of India
Case Number C.A. No.-005700-005700 – 2014
Diary Number 32833/2013
Judge Name HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
Bench
  • HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
  • HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN
Precedent Value Binding authority
Overrules / Affirms
  • Affirms TNERC and APTEL decisions
  • Reaffirms necessity to align PPAs with regulations
Type of Law Regulatory law – Electricity Act, 2003 and grid‐synchronization tariffs
Questions of Law
  • Whether an unapproved PPA’s project‐level COD clause yields to CERC/TNERC regs requiring unit‐level COD
  • If continuous open‐cycle supply pre‐project COD is “firm power” entitled to fixed charges?
Ratio Decidendi
  1. Unapproved PPAs must be approved under Section 86(1)(b) and aligned with regulations framed under Sections 61 & 178 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
  2. CERC (2004) and TNERC (2005) Regulations define COD per generating unit and distinguish “infirm power” (pre‐unit COD) from “firm power” (post‐unit COD).
  3. Continuous supply by a synchronized open‐cycle gas turbine from 29.10.2005 met unit COD requirements and thus constituted firm power.
  4. Fixed charges cannot be denied for pre‐project COD supply when regulatory COD is satisfied.
Judgments Relied Upon
  • Tata Power Co. Ltd. v. Reliance Energy Ltd. (2009) 16 SCC 659
  • KKK Hydro Power Ltd. v. HPSEB (2025) SCC OnLine SC 1847
  • PTC India Ltd. v. CERC (2010) 4 SCC 603
  • State of Himachal Pradesh v. JSW Hydro Energy Ltd. (2025) SCC OnLine SC 1460
Logic / Jurisprudence / Authorities Relied Upon by the Court
  • Section 43A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 notification dated 30.03.1992 on two‐part tariff
  • Sections 61, 62, 63, 86 & 178 of the Electricity Act, 2003
  • CERC (Terms & Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2004 (Defs. of COD, Declared Capacity, Infirm Power)
  • TNERC (Tariff) Regulations, 2005
Facts as Summarised by the Court
  • Amendment of PPA on 25.08.2004 defined a single COD for combined‐cycle project subject to 47.52 MW capacity test
  • Open‐cycle gas turbine synchronized on 29.10.2005, continuously supplied ~153 MU to grid
  • Appellant paid only variable charges invoking PPA COD clause

Practical Impact

Category Impact
Binding On All subordinate courts
Persuasive For Other High Courts, regulatory commissions
Distinguishes State of Himachal Pradesh v. JSW Hydro Energy Ltd. (2025) SCC OnLine SC 1460
Follows
  • Tata Power Co. Ltd. v. Reliance Energy Ltd. (2009) 16 SCC 659
  • KKK Hydro Power Ltd. v. HPSEB (2025) SCC OnLine SC 1847
  • PTC India Ltd. v. CERC (2010) 4 SCC 603

What’s New / What Lawyers Should Note

  • Confirms that any PPA amended after 10.06.2004 must be approved and aligned with CERC (2004) and TNERC (2005) Regulations under Sections 61 & 178, 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
  • Clarifies that COD under regulations applies per generating unit; project‐level COD clauses cannot override unit synchronization dates.
  • Holds continuous supply by a synchronized open‐cycle gas turbine from its unit COD qualifies as firm power, attracting fixed charges despite a later combined‐cycle COD in PPA.
  • Rejects waiver/estoppel arguments based on pre-COD correspondence when regulatory definitions of COD and firm/infirm power differ from PPA.

Summary of Legal Reasoning

  1. Regulatory Hierarchy: The Electricity Act, 2003 (Sections 61–63, 86, 178) empowers CERC/TNERC to specify tariff terms; old 1948 Act regulations saved only to 10.06.2004.
  2. PPA Approval & Alignment: An amended PPA (25.08.2004) without TNERC approval under Section 86(1)(b) yields to CERC (2004) & TNERC (2005) Regulations per precedents (Tata Power, KKK Hydro, PTC).
  3. COD Definitions: CERC/TNERC treat COD per unit (Reg 14(xx), 15) and distinguish infirm (pre‐unit COD) vs. firm power (post‐unit COD).
  4. Application: Gas turbine open‐cycle unit synchronized on 29.10.2005 met unit COD, supplied continuously → firm power; PPA’s project‐level COD (01.07.2006) is subordinate.
  5. Contractual Estoppel Rejected: Pre‐COD letters did not override regulatory COD definitions or entitlement to fixed charges once unit COD achieved.

Arguments by the Parties

Petitioner (Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Co. Ltd.)

  • PPA’s sole COD clause (01.07.2006) governs; pre-COD supply is infirm power.
  • Correspondence admitted variable-charge treatment until project COD.
  • No conflict between PPA clause and CERC/TNERC regulations; PPA terms enforceable without regulatory approval unless expressly conflicting.
  • Regulatory approval not prerequisite to contract enforcement; waiver/estoppel bars respondent.
  • Higher fixed charges would burden public interest.

Respondent (M/s Penna Electricity Ltd.)

  • Amended PPA not approved under Section 86(1)(b) → non-binding if conflicting with regulations.
  • 30.03.1992 notification (1948 Act), CERC (2004) & TNERC (2005) require separate CODs per unit based on grid synchronization.
  • Gas turbine unit synchronized 29.10.2005, delivered continuous 30 MW → firm power.
  • State Commission correctly aligned PPA with Central/State regulations.

Factual Background

  1. Original PPA dated 29.04.1998 (diesel‐engine technology) later amended on 25.08.2004 to combined‐cycle gas turbine technology and tariff adjustment.
  2. Amended PPA defined a single “Date of Commercial Operation” upon 47.52 MW project capacity test (combined cycle).
  3. The open‐cycle gas turbine unit was synchronized with the grid on 29.10.2005 and supplied power continuously until 30.06.2006.
  4. Appellant paid only variable charges, classifying supply as “infirm power”; respondent claimed entitlement to firm power fixed charges.
  5. TNERC and APTEL held for respondent; SC appeal challenged classification and regulatory alignment.

Statutory Analysis

  • Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 §43A: two-part tariff (fixed & variable) for thermal stations; COD defined as synchronization date (notification 30.03.1992).
  • Electricity Act, 2003 §§61–63: empowers CERC/TNERC to specify tariff terms, saves old notifications until 10.06.2004. §86(1)(b): PPA approval mandatory.
  • CERC (Terms & Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2004: Reg 14(xx)/(xxi)/(xxiv) define unit, COD per unit/station, infirm power; Reg 15 sets fixed & variable charges components.
  • TNERC (Tariff) Regulations, 2005: guided by CERC Regulations under Reg 4, identical COD/unit definitions.

Alert Indicators

  • ✔ Precedent Followed – Affirms existing regulatory supremacy and PPA alignment principles under Electricity Act, 2003.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

No comments to show.