When a writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn at the very outset on request of the petitioner, the court does not adjudicate any legal issue or provide binding precedent on merits. Such an order is not precedent for future cases and does not affect the substantive rights or liabilities at issue.
Summary
| Category | Data |
|---|---|
| Case Name | CWP/5290/2024 of M/S DEEPAK BUILDERS AND ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. Vs UT CHD. AND OTHERS |
| CNR | PHHC010290372024 |
| Date of Registration | 02-03-2024 |
| Decision Date | 30-10-2025 |
| Disposal Nature | DISMISSED |
| Judgment Author | MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER |
| Court | High Court of Punjab and Haryana |
| Precedent Value | Not a precedent on merits (no law laid down) |
Practical Impact
| Category | Impact |
|---|---|
| Binding On | Not binding; no pronouncement on merits or law |
| Persuasive For | Not persuasive on substantive legal issues |
What’s New / What Lawyers Should Note
- Dismissal as withdrawn at the request of the petitioner means the court has not ruled on any legal issue or on the validity of the impugned notices.
- Such orders carry no precedential weight on questions of law or fact.
Summary of Legal Reasoning
- The judgment records that the petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition at the outset.
- The bench does not address the merits of the petition, the impugned notices, or any legal issue.
- The court accordingly dismisses the petition as withdrawn, with closure of all pending applications.
Arguments by the Parties
Petitioner
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition.
Respondent
No arguments on merits recorded in the judgment.
Factual Background
- The petitioner had filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking to quash notices dated 20.09.2023 and 13.02.2024.
- Before arguments could be advanced, counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition.
Statutory Analysis
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India was invoked in seeking writ jurisdiction.
- No statutory interpretation, narrowing, or reading down was undertaken, as no merits were considered.
Procedural Innovations
No procedural innovations noted; standard procedure followed for withdrawal and dismissal of writ petitions.
Alert Indicators
- ✔ Precedent Followed – No new law, precedent, or deviation; standard dismissal on withdrawal.