The Court clarified that the dismissal of a writ petition as withdrawn results in no adjudication on the merits and does not lay down any law for future cases. This dispositional order does not alter, affirm, or overrule any existing precedent, and such orders carry no binding or persuasive precedential value.
Summary
| Category | Data |
|---|---|
| Case Name | WP/14611/2019 of Venkata Ravi varma Laxmana Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, CNR APHC010314992019 |
| Date of Registration | 24-09-2019 |
| Decision Date | 03-09-2025 |
| Disposal Nature | WITHDRAWN |
| Judgment Author | B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI |
| Court | High Court of Andhra Pradesh |
| Precedent Value | Not a precedent; no binding or persuasive effect |
| Questions of Law | None decided; petition withdrawn |
Practical Impact
| Category | Impact |
|---|---|
| Binding On | None; has no binding effect |
| Persuasive For | None; not a persuasive precedent |
What’s New / What Lawyers Should Note
- Dismissal of a writ petition as withdrawn means that no pronouncement is made on any legal issue raised in that petition.
- Orders of withdrawal do not carry any precedential or persuasive value for future cases.
Summary of Legal Reasoning
- The Court simply recorded that the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
- No reasons, analysis, or rulings on law or fact were provided.
- The withdrawal did not result in any adjudication on the merits of the case or any of the legal issues raised.
Arguments by the Parties
Arguments, if any, are not recorded in the order as the petition was withdrawn.
Factual Background
- The writ petition was filed and thereafter withdrawn by the petitioner, resulting in summary dismissal by the High Court without adjudication on the merits.
Statutory Analysis
- No statutory provisions were discussed or interpreted.
Procedural Innovations
- None; the withdrawal was noted as per established procedures.
Alert Indicators
- ✔ Precedent Followed – No new law laid down; withdrawal recognized as not setting any precedent.