A civil revision petition disposed of by order without recorded reasons does not create binding or persuasive precedent for future cases; practical value as legal authority is null when the court offers no reasoning or principle. Upholds settled principle that only reasoned decisions possess precedential value in civil procedure.
Summary
| Category | Data |
|---|---|
| Case Name | CRP/3304/2025 of Shiksha Vs Gaurav |
| CNR | HBHC010540112025 |
| Date of Registration | 10-09-2025 |
| Decision Date | 31-10-2025 |
| Disposal Nature | DISPOSED OF NO COSTS |
| Judgment Author | P. SAM KOSHY |
| Court | High Court for State of Telangana |
| Precedent Value | No binding or persuasive precedent established (disposal without reasons) |
Practical Impact
| Category | Impact |
|---|---|
| Binding On | None; order does not offer a ratio or legal principle to bind or persuade other courts |
| Persuasive For | None; absence of recorded reasons removes value as persuasive precedent |
What’s New / What Lawyers Should Note
- Orders disposing of civil revision petitions without recording judicial reasons do not establish binding or persuasive precedent for subsequent cases.
- Lawyers should not cite such unreasoned orders as legal authority.
- Future citations require reasoned judgments with a discernible ratio or guiding principle.
Summary of Legal Reasoning
- The judgment consists solely of an order stating that the civil revision petition is disposed of, with no costs and no further reasoning.
- No legal principles, statutes, or case law have been discussed or applied.
- As no reasoning has been recorded, no new legal clarification, interpretation or modification exists within this order.
Arguments by the Parties
No arguments or submissions by either party are recorded in the judgment.
Factual Background
The order does not record or summarise any factual background relevant to the civil revision petition.
Statutory Analysis
No statutory provisions are discussed, interpreted, or analysed in the order.
Dissenting / Concurring Opinion Summary
No dissenting or concurring opinion is recorded in the judgment.
Procedural Innovations
No new procedures, directives, or guidelines appear in the order.
Alert Indicators
- ✔ Precedent Followed – Confirms that only reasoned judgments can acquire binding or persuasive authority; this order, without recorded reasons, follows that established principle and does not break new legal ground.