A writ petition dismissed as infructuous by the Andhra Pradesh High Court, without entering into the merits or issues of law, does not operate as binding precedent nor clarify, overrule, or affirm any substantial legal principle; its precedential value is minimal for future advocacy.
Summary
| Category | Data |
|---|---|
| Case Name | WP/12010/2019 of Shaik Hussain Bee, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, CNR APHC010264952019 |
| Date of Registration | 22-08-2019 |
| Decision Date | 27-10-2025 |
| Disposal Nature | DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS |
| Judgment Author | B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI |
| Court | High Court of Andhra Pradesh |
| Precedent Value | None; order does not decide any question of law |
Practical Impact
| Category | Impact |
|---|---|
| Binding On | Not binding as precedent |
| Persuasive For | Does not have persuasive value |
What’s New / What Lawyers Should Note
- Dismissal of a writ petition as infructuous, without going into the legal merits, does not amount to a pronouncement on any legal issue.
- Such orders do not create precedent, binding or persuasive, upon subordinate courts or in future litigation.
- Lawyers should not rely on such dismissals to argue for legal propositions or as authority on substantive or procedural law.
Summary of Legal Reasoning
- The High Court, per B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI J, dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
- No examination of facts or law took place; the dismissal was purely on the ground that the writ petition no longer required adjudication.
- The judgment does not contain any discussion, interpretation, or application of statutory or constitutional provisions.
- No precedents were relied upon or distinguished, nor was any ratio decidendi evolved.
Factual Background
- The writ petition, WP No. 12010 of 2019, registered on 22-08-2019, was brought before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
- On 28-10-2025, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous, indicating that the matter no longer required adjudication.
- No facts of the underlying dispute or events leading to infructuousness are stated in the order.
Statutory Analysis
- No statutory or constitutional provisions are analyzed or interpreted in this order.
- The judgment merely records the procedural dismissal.
Alert Indicators
- ✔ Precedent Followed – The court did not overrule or modify existing law; petition was dismissed without adjudication.