The Madras High Court reiterates that service rendered as a part-time Village Assistant prior to regularisation (before June 1, 1995)

The Madras High Court reaffirms that complaints dismissed for default under Section 256(1), CrPC, rather than on the merits, can

Registered sale agreements may be proven, by oral and documentary evidence, as executed only as security for a loan transaction—not

The Madras High Court has reaffirmed that suppression or non-disclosure of facts by the insured is “material” only if it

The court affirmed that when the academic session in question has concluded, challenges to admission processes for that session become

The Madras High Court has ruled that continuous service on a contractual basis, even if exceeding ten years, does not

The Madras High Court reiterates that any deviation from the specific procedural requirements of Clause 33 of the Bipartite Settlement—in

The Madras High Court held that when an employee is allowed to continue in service for an extended period beyond

The Madras High Court affirms, in line with the Full Bench judgment in S. Ganapathy v. N. Senthilvel, that appeals

The Madras High Court reaffirmed that appeals can be dismissed for non-prosecution where the appellant fails to provide necessary instructions

The Madras High Court conclusively applies the Supreme Court’s ratio in Umadevi (2006) to dismiss claims for regularization by outsourced

The Madras High Court has affirmed that services rendered in non-provincialised government bodies, if regularised prior to 01.04.2003, must be