High Court upholds mandatory transfer of pending commercial disputes under Section 15(2) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, as binding
Court Clarifies That Section 16(1) Does Not Preclude a Hearing and Reaffirms Limited Scope of Writ Review in Technical Alignment
The Uttarakhand High Court answers in the affirmative, upholding established anticipatory‐bail precedents under Article 21 for offences under the Bharatiya
Summary Category Data Case Name WPMS/2509/2025 of GAUTAM KUMAR Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND CNR UKHC010130652025 Date of Registration 21-08-2025
High Court of Uttarakhand reaffirms established bail jurisprudence, allowing release once a charge-sheet is filed and tampering risk is minimal
The High Court reaffirms that “bail is the rule and jail is the exception” under Article 21; upholding established precedent,
High Court Upholds Existing Bail Principles, Granting Relief When No Independent Evidence Supports the Accusation Summary Category Data Case
High Court Upholds Judicial Restraint under Article 226 by Directing Time-Bound Administrative Remedy for Potential Property Damage; Affirms Existing Precedent,
The High Court reaffirmed that the plain language of these provisos covers all members retiring from the Cooperative Tribunal—including those
High Court upholds statutory transfer norms over medical hardship claims, permitting only statutory representation—binding on subordinate courts Summary Category
Can anticipatory bail be allowed even after charge-sheet filing when personal liberty under Article 21 outweighs the need for further
The High Court reaffirms that petitions seeking seniority adjustment and related arrears become infructuous once service has ceased, upholding existing