Does a Writ Petition Become Infructuous Simply by Efflux of Time? – Clarification by High Court of Uttarakhand
The court held that when the petitioners themselves declare their writ petitions infructuous due to passage of time, such petitions
The court held that when the petitioners themselves declare their writ petitions infructuous due to passage of time, such petitions
The High Court clarified that where petitioners acknowledge that the cause of action is no longer subsisting due to the
The High Court reiterates that writ petitions seeking relief in admission-related matters become infructuous if the legal basis for the
The High Court of Uttarakhand reaffirms that writ petitions that have become infructuous—such as those involving unsuccessful candidates in entrance
The court reaffirmed that writ petitions become infructuous and liable for dismissal when the relief sought is rendered impossible due
The court reaffirmed that when a petitioner’s counsel states that the writ petition has become infructuous, the writ petition can
The Uttarakhand High Court clarified that when petitioners themselves admit the cause of action no longer survives—such as failure to
The Court held that writ petitions which become infructuous due to supervening circumstances—such as petitioners no longer having locus because
The Uttarakhand High Court held that the decision of the employer regarding educational qualifications, including equivalence, is final and binding
Courts may dismiss writ petitions as infructuous when circumstances change or relief is no longer required, upon a statement by
The Uttarakhand High Court reiterates that conviction for dacoity under Section 395 IPC cannot be sustained unless the essential threshold
The Uttarakhand High Court has held that conviction under Section 395 IPC (dacoity) is legally unsustainable when only four persons