The court clarified that project-affected persons alleging entitlement under an earlier policy, rather than a superseding one, must be allowed

The court reaffirmed that if, during the pendency of a writ petition, the relief claimed is granted or the issue

The court reiterated that a petition dismissed for non-prosecution does not decide the substantive legal issues on merit. This decision

The Uttarakhand High Court confirms that criminal proceedings under Sections 279 and 338 IPC can be quashed under Section 528

High Court affirms Uttarakhand appellate court’s authority under Article 227 to set aside a trial court’s rejection of an injunction

High Court reaffirms seven-year limitation for Section 406 IPC complaints and upholds inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC—binding on subordinate

Yes. The Uttarakhand High Court reaffirmed its power to set aside trial-court orders in commercial suits and allow written statements

The Uttarakhand High Court reaffirms that absence of direct evidence and prolonged custody justify bail under CrPC—even for UAPA charges,

High Court upholds its supervisory jurisdiction to direct subordinate courts on timelines for interlocutory relief, creating binding authority for expeditious

High Court of Uttarakhand reaffirms statutory authority autonomy by holding that ministerial orders cannot override contractual security‐deposit release provisions; serves

Uttarakhand High Court holds that ministerial orders cannot lawfully withhold security deposits for satisfactorily completed municipal works, affirming existing administrative‐law

High Court Reaffirms Non-Interference Principle in Administrative Selections, Providing Binding Guidance for Educational Institutions and Subordinate Courts   Summary Category