Yes – the Chhattisgarh High Court applies and affirms the Supreme Court’s Celestium Financial ruling that a complainant under Section

Clarifying the appellant’s right to prefer an appeal under the proviso to Section 372(2) CrPC, upholding the Supreme Court’s Celestium

Reaffirming the Requirement for a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence and the Limited Scope of Section 27 of the Evidence

Reaffirming the necessity of credible ocular and medical corroboration in IPC assault cases; High Court of Chhattisgarh affirms acquittal and

The High Court of Chhattisgarh, affirming the Supreme Court’s ruling in M/s Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 INSC 804),

Clarification of Victim Definition and Appeal Right under BNSS in Light of Supreme Court’s Celestium Financial Decision   Summary Category

High Court of Chhattisgarh affirms existing precedent that indefinite delay caused by non-production of evidence warrants acquittal; binding on subordinate

High Court Upholds Supreme Court’s Celestium Financial Ruling, Grants 45-Day Liberty to File Appeal; Binding on Subordinate Courts in NI

The Chhattisgarh High Court held that where a duly recorded dying declaration describes an accidental burn without any allegation of

  Summary Category Data Case Name CRA No. 256 of 2007 of Kole @ Deeman Rathore vs State of Chhattisgarh

  Summary Category Data Case Name ACQA/303/2019 of Brijmohan Agrawal Vs Avinash Kumar Sahu CNR CGHC010131892019 Date of Registration 11-04-2019