Can a Complainant Under Section 138 NI Act Appeal as a “Victim” and Be Excused From Delay Under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC?

High Court Applies Celestium Financial to Extend Appellate Rights to NI Act Complainants, Affirms Victim-Centric Interpretation, and Waives Limitation if

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Can a High Court refuse to interfere with an acquittal under Section 138 NI Act when the complainant fails to prove enforceable debt and the statutory presumption is rebutted?

Clarifying that non-production of transaction records or ledger accounts and a plausible defence of cheque misuse can successfully rebut the

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Can a Complainant in a Section 138 NI Act Case Challenge an Acquittal Under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC?

Clarifying the Right of Appeal Post–Celestium Financial: High Court Upholds Complainant’s Liberty to File Acquittal Appeals Within Relaxed Limitation Period

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Can gang rape convictions under Section 376(d) IPC be upheld despite delayed FIR, TIP irregularities, hostile witnesses, and lack of DNA testing?

Chhattisgarh High Court affirms established precedents on hostile-witness evidence, excuses delay in rape FIRs, and holds FSL and medical findings

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Is a Complainant in a Section 138 NI Act Proceeding a ‘Victim’ Under BNSS and Entitled to Appeal Despite Time Bar?

High Court of Chhattisgarh reaffirms Supreme Court’s Celestium Financial precedent, upholding appellate remedy under Section 413 BNSS (proviso to Section

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Can additions under Section 68 on unexplained cash credits and under Section 145(3) on estimated production yield stand on mere suspicion when the assessee furnishes comprehensive documentary evidence?

Court reaffirms existing precedents on burden‐shifting in unexplained cash credits and limits on conjectural additions under income‐tax assessments   Summary

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Can a State’s Technical Education Authority Fix an Earlier Admission Cut-off Despite the AICTE Academic Calendar?

Clarifying That the AICTE’s Admission Timeline Applies Only to Newly Affiliated Institutes, Upholding State-Fixed Counseling Schedules as Binding Authority  

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Can Established Technical Institutes Invoke AICTE Academic Calendar to Extend Admission Counselling Schedule?

The High Court rejects extension, holding AICTE’s calendar applicability limited to newly affiliated institutes—upholding state’s counselling timeline in technical education

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Can a Complainant in a Cheque-Bounce Case Be a “Victim” Entitled to Appeal an Acquittal under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC?

High Court Upholds Supreme Court in Celestium Financial (2025 INSC 804), Confirming That Complainants under Section 138 NI Act Are

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Should minimum wage rates govern monthly income computation in motor accident death claims?

High Court of Chhattisgarh affirms Sarla Verma, Pranay Sethi and Magma guidelines; holds that, in absence of conclusive proof, minimum

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Can a rape conviction under Section 376(3) IPC and POCSO Act stand without conclusive proof of the victim’s minority?

When lack of material evidence on age requires conversion of Section 376(3) IPC to Section 376(1) — High Court of

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh

Are successive departmental charge-sheets on identical allegations subject to premature judicial interference before any enquiry conclusion?

High Court of Chhattisgarh reaffirms that charge-sheets cannot be quashed at the initial stage for technical or repetitive defects, permitting

READ MORE
September 4, 2025 | High Court Of Chhattisgarh