The High Court of Chhattisgarh upholds its discretionary power to dismiss an appeal as withdrawn with liberty for alternative remedies—affirming
HC affirms homicidal death but applies Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC to convert conviction under Section 302 to Section
The Chhattisgarh High Court affirms conviction for unauthorized electricity “hook-up” under Section 135-A of the Electricity Act, 2003, while exercising
High Court reaffirms the necessity to invoke writ jurisdiction against final executive orders and permits withdrawal with liberty, reinforcing procedural
High Court Clarifies Application of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, Affirms Conversion of Section 302 Conviction to Section 304
Clarifying that a notification-driven change from “rural” to “urban” status cannot override a child’s merit-based selection under the Right to
Reaffirmation of Supreme Court precedents: acquittal where demand, acceptance and recovery are not proved; binding authority for subordinate courts in
Affirming Celestium Financial (2025 INSC 804), High Court of Chhattisgarh Reserves Liberty to File Appeal under Proviso to Section 372
High Court affirms Supreme Court’s Celestium Financial ruling that Section 138 NI Act complainants qualify as “victims” under BNSS and
High Court Affirms Supreme Court’s “Sterling Witness” Standard, Quashes Conviction Due to Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration Summary Category
Upholding Precedent on Section 28 SR Act and Binding on Subordinate Courts in Civil Property Disputes Summary Category Data
Summary Category Data Case Name ACQA No. 160 of 2020 of PRAGATI MAHILA SAHAKARI BANK MARYADIT Vs A. CHANNEYA