The Calcutta High Court answers “no,” reaffirming that normal contradictions and incomplete recovery of weapons do not defeat convictions when

The Calcutta High Court affirms that minor contradictions, inquest irregularities, or non-recovery of weapons do not automatically undermine convictions under

The Calcutta High Court affirms the power to dispose appeals on settlement terms, add previously non-partied respondents who have affirmed

Calcutta High Court reaffirms that where relief has been granted by respondents, a writ petition may be summarily disposed of

Reaffirming that normal discrepancies, inquest limitations, and minor investigative omissions do not undermine murder and grievous‐hurt convictions; acquitting those not

Calcutta High Court affirms that minor contradictions, preliminary inquest reports and post-mortem meal-time estimations do not derail convictions; binding authority

Calcutta High Court upholds established bail principles, binding on subordinate courts, affirming that overwhelming material and gravity of charges justify

Does the Calcutta High Court’s rejection of bail reaffirm the established principle that the nature and gravity of an offence

Calcutta High Court permits withdrawal of a bail application under Section 483, dismissing the petition as withdrawn while enabling the

The Calcutta High Court reaffirms that reservation norms for promotional posts apply only after written‐exam qualification, distinguishes earlier Division Bench