Yes—the Calcutta High Court reaffirmed that when a co-accused on identical charges secures bail and the State does not oppose,

No Prejudice in Charge Framing Upholds Conviction; Chance-Witness Evidence, Section 27 Recoveries, and Inquest-PM Distinctions Affirmed by Calcutta HC  

The Calcutta High Court affirms that absent any real prejudice to the accused, defects in framing charges under Sections 302/34/120B

Calcutta High Court answered affirming that a co-sharer may convey only the share he actually holds and that a partition

Calcutta High Court Affirms That Minor’s Consent Is Invalid and Section 182 BNSS Protection Cannot Be Extended Post Charge-Sheet, Rejecting

Yes. The Calcutta High Court reaffirmed that bail under Section 439 CrPC read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

Calcutta High Court reaffirms the parity principle in bail applications where the State does not oppose, extending identical relief to

Calcutta High Court reaffirms discretionary bail where the accused has no nexus to the offence and the victim fails to

Calcutta High Court upholds its inherent power to condone delay and restore a writ petition dismissed for default, offering persuasive

The High Court held that where parties are married and living together—and the accused is a juvenile—custodial interrogation is unnecessary.

Calcutta High Court reaffirms inherent power to record settlements, add affected non-parties via affidavits, and dispose of appeals — persuasive

Calcutta High Court confirms that once the grievance is resolved, no further adjudication is required   Summary Category Data Case