Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) reaffirms that the State/acquiring authority cannot discriminately pursue appeals on similar land acquisition awards, following

The Bombay High Court has clarified that claimants are entitled to receive higher compensation than the amount claimed if the

The Court held that the State and its instrumentalities cannot selectively appeal land acquisition awards when similar cases have been

The Bombay High Court reaffirms the application of the doctrine of notional extension to accidents occurring outside the employer’s premises,

The Bombay High Court holds that an acquiring authority’s “pick and choose” approach—challenging enhanced compensation awarded by the Reference Court

Consistent non-appearance of the petitioner, even after admission and service of notice, entitles the High Court to dismiss the writ

The Bombay High Court reaffirmed that, where statutory law mandates the issuance of reassessment notices by a Faceless Assessing Officer,

The Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that an acquiring authority cannot selectively accept certain Reference Court awards while challenging similar

The Bombay High Court has reiterated that State authorities cannot discriminate among similarly situated landowners by adopting a “pick and

State authorities cannot challenge enhancement of compensation for some landowners while acquiescing in awards for others in comparable circumstances. The

Bombay High Court upholds bar on State adopting a discriminatory “pick and choose” approach in challenging compensation awards under the

The Bombay High Court has affirmed that once the State or its agency accepts a compensation award for some landholders,