The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, holds that the acquiring authority cannot adopt a “pick and choose” approach—accepting compensation awards

Bombay High Court holds that a state or its instrumentality cannot challenge enhanced compensation in some land acquisition matters while

The Bombay High Court reiterates that government or its instrumentalities cannot “pick and choose” which similar compensation awards to appeal

The Bombay High Court has held that the State or its instrumentalities cannot adopt a “pick and choose” approach in

The Bombay High Court, reaffirming settled law, held that State instrumentalities cannot adopt a pick-and-choose approach by accepting enhanced compensation

The Bombay High Court reaffirmed that claimants in land acquisition disputes may be entitled to receive compensation higher than what

The Bombay High Court reiterates that acquiring authorities cannot selectively appeal enhanced land compensation awards when similar awards are accepted

The Bombay High Court has held that the acquiring authority (State or its instrumentalities) cannot adopt a “pick and choose”

The Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that land acquisition authorities cannot adopt discriminatory “pick and choose” tactics in appeals—if compensation

The Bombay High Court has reaffirmed existing Supreme Court precedent that prohibits discriminatory appeals by the State (or its instrumentalities)

The Bombay High Court holds that claimants are entitled to the full compensation to which they are legally entitled, even

The Bombay High Court has held that the State (or its instrumentalities) cannot adopt a ‘pick and choose’ approach by