Can an Insurer Challenge Vehicle Involvement Without Evidence, and Is 12% Penal Interest Sustainable Under Section 173 MVA?

 

Summary

Category Data
Case Name MAC/488/2022 of United India Insurance Company Limited Vs Suman Uike
CNR CGHC010084282022
Date of Registration 01-04-2022
Decision Date 02-09-2025
Disposal Nature Disposed with modification of interest rate to 8% p.a.
Judgment Author Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Court High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur
Bench Single-Judge Bench
Precedent Value Binding
Overrules / Affirms Affirms existing precedent
Type of Law Motor Vehicles Law
Questions of Law
  • Whether a plea of wrongful implication of vehicle without evidence can exonerate insurer from liability?
  • Whether penal interest beyond 8% p.a. is sustainable under Section 173 MVA?
Ratio Decidendi The insurer’s express plea disputing the vehicle’s involvement attracts the burden of proof under Section 101 of the Evidence Act; failure to lead any evidence means the plea must fail and liability stands. Further, Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act allows interest at 8% per annum only; imposition of 12% penal interest was unsustainable and is set aside.
Logic / Jurisprudence / Authorities Relied Upon Burden of proof principle under Section 101 of the Evidence Act
Facts as Summarised by the Court Accident occurred on 02 May 2018; deceased died on 12 May 2018; vehicle seized on 29 August 2018; Tribunal awarded ₹58,82,200/− plus 8% interest and 12% penal interest; insurer appealed under Section 173 MVA.
Citations
  • 2025:CGHC:44736
  • MAC No. 488 of 2022
  • NAFR
  • CNR CGHC010084282022

Practical Impact

Category Impact
Binding On All Motor Accident Claims Tribunals and subordinate courts within Chhattisgarh High Court’s jurisdiction
Persuasive For Other High Courts dealing with appeals under Section 173 MVA

What’s New / What Lawyers Should Note

  • Insurers disputing vehicle involvement must adduce concrete evidence; mere assertions in written statements are insufficient.
  • Burden of proof under Section 101 of the Evidence Act applies equally to insurance companies challenging accident linkage.
  • Under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, post-award interest is capped at 8% p.a.; penal rates above that are not sustainable.

Summary of Legal Reasoning

  1. The insurer in its written statement expressly pleaded that the Wagon R (CG 4 DK 1211) was wrongly implicated and seized late, but led no evidence to substantiate that plea.
  2. The Claims Tribunal recorded (para 18) that neither owner nor driver challenged the vehicle’s involvement; burden to prove wrongful implication lay on the insurer.
  3. Failure to discharge the burden under Section 101 of the Evidence Act resulted in liability being fastened on the insurer.
  4. The Tribunal’s award of 8% interest per annum from the date of claim filing (23 Feb 2019) was upheld.
  5. Penal interest of 12% per annum (para 32(2)) was found to exceed the statutory ceiling under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act and was reduced to 8% p.a.

Arguments by the Parties

Petitioner (Insurance Company)

  • The vehicle was wrongly implicated as the accident occurred on 02 May 2018 but the vehicle was seized only on 29 August 2018.
  • No liability should attach if the vehicle was not involved.
  • 12% penal interest is unsustainable under Section 173 MVA.

Respondents 7 & 8 (Driver & Owner)

  • The vehicle was duly insured and legally on the road at the time of accident.
  • The Claims Tribunal correctly fastened liability on the insurer; appeal deserves dismissal.

Respondents 1–6 (Claimants)

  • Did not appear despite service of notice.

Factual Background

A Wagon R (CG 4 DK 1211) allegedly caused an accident on 02 May 2018, leading to the death of a police constable on 12 May 2018. The vehicle was seized on 29 August 2018. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded ₹58,82,200/− compensation to the claimants with 8% interest and 12% penal interest. The insurer appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, disputing both vehicle involvement and the penal interest rate.

Statutory Analysis

  • Section 101, Evidence Act: Places the evidentiary burden on a party pleading wrongful implication of a vehicle.
  • Section 173, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Governs appellate powers of High Courts in motor accident claims and prescribes interest at 8% p.a.; does not authorize higher penal rates.

Alert Indicators

  • Precedent Followed

Citations

  • 2025:CGHC:44736
  • MAC No. 488 of 2022
  • NAFR
  • CNR CGHC010084282022
  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 173
  • Evidence Act, 1872, Section 101

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

No comments to show.