The Uttarakhand High Court answers in the affirmative—anticipatory bail can be made absolute once the charge-sheet is filed and custodial interrogation is unnecessary, reaffirming personal liberty under Article 21 and providing a binding precedent on bail conditions in healthcare-sector FIRs. Summary Category Data Case Name ABA/311/2025 of GAURAV AGARWAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND CNR […]
Affirming existing precedent, the Uttarakhand High Court holds that personal liberty under Article 21 warrants anticipatory bail, converting interim bail into final relief with conditions; persuasive authority in criminal cases Summary Category Data Case Name ABA/265/2025 of RISHI BAJAJ Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND CNR UKHC010033292025 Date of Registration 11-03-2025 Decision Date 18-08-2025 Disposal Nature […]
Upholding Personal Liberty in Non-Heinous Offences, Binding on Subordinate Courts Summary Category Data Case Name ABA/291/2025 of RITIK Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND CNR UKHC010036962025 Decision Date 18-08-2025 Disposal Nature ALLOWED Judgment Author Hon’ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma Court High Court of Uttarakhand Type of Law Criminal Law Questions of Law When and how […]
Upholding existing precedent and enforcing statutory transfer rules under Chapter VI of the Uttarakhand Panchayati Raj Act, 2016, High Court’s answer: An appeal against a Single Judge’s transfer-restraint order grounded on an unchallenged Division Bench judgment cannot be entertained. The Competent Authority must issue fresh transfer orders in accordance with Chapter VI of the Uttarakhand […]
Calcutta High Court Affirms That Minor’s Consent Is Invalid and Section 182 BNSS Protection Cannot Be Extended Post Charge-Sheet, Rejecting Anticipatory Bail Summary Category Data Case Name CRM (A)/2763/2025 of PPPPPPP Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR CNR WBCHCA0352832025 Date of Registration 01-08-2025 Decision Date 18-08-2025 Disposal Nature REJECTED Court Calcutta High Court […]
Yes. The Calcutta High Court reaffirmed that bail under Section 439 CrPC read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 may be granted if the material on record does not justify continued detention—even when antecedents exist—and held the order as binding on subordinate courts. Summary Category Data Case Name CRM(M)/1075/2025 of […]
Calcutta High Court reaffirms the parity principle in bail applications where the State does not oppose, extending identical relief to co-accused under criminal procedure law. Summary Category Data Case Name CRM(M)/1076/2025 of SAMRAT SINGH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL CNR WBCHCA0320812025 Date of Registration 16-07-2025 Decision Date 18-08-2025 Disposal Nature ALLOWED Judgment Author HON’BLE […]
Calcutta High Court reaffirms discretionary bail where the accused has no nexus to the offence and the victim fails to identify him—persuasive authority in criminal bail proceedings Summary Category Data Case Name CRM(M)/1082/2025 of ROKY HAZRA @ ROKI HAZRA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL CNR WBCHCA0324162025 Decision Date 18-08-2025 Disposal Nature ALLOWED Judgment Author […]
High Court reaffirms Supreme Court precedents (Lata Singh, Arumugam Servia), disposes petition at threshold stage; clarifies no opinion on personal‐law validity per Doly Rani Summary Category Data Case Name WP(C)/1963/2025 of ASHA BANO AND ANR Vs UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (HOME) AND ORS CNR JKHC010041732025 Date of Registration 13-08-2025 Decision Date 18-08-2025 […]
Summary Category Data Case Name WP(C)/22485/2025 of NIMAI CHARAN DANDSENA Vs STATE OF ODISHA CNR ODHC010565502025 Decision Date 18-08-2025 Disposal Nature Disposed Off Judgment Author MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Court Orissa High Court Bench Single Judge Precedent Value Persuasive Authority Type of Law Service Law / Administrative Law Ratio Decidendi Under Article 226 […]
Orissa High Court permits 50% interim withdrawal of awarded compensation instead of 10% on grounds of financial hardship, illustrating appellate jurisdiction to adjust interim relief in railway claims. Summary Category Data Case Name FAO No. 376 of 2025 of PRMESHWAR NAYAK@PARMESHWAR NAYAK Vs UNION OF INDIA CNR ODHC010562432025 Decision Date 18-08-2025 Disposal Nature Disposed […]
Court Reaffirms That Non-Appearance Under Section 115 CPC Warrants Dismissal for Default; Madras High Court Single-Judge Ruling Binding on Parties Summary Category Data Case Name C.R.P.(NPD).No.3262 of 2017 of S. Prabakaran Vs A.R. Govardhan CNR HCMA011870092017 Decision Date 03-09-2021 Disposal Nature Dismissed for default Judgment Author V.M. Velamani, J. Court High Court of Judicature […]