Can an Executive Notification under Section 3 of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act Take Effect Before Its Gazette Publication?

 

Summary

Category Data
Court Supreme Court of India
Case Number C.A. No.-000438-000438 – 2026
Diary Number 2376/2019
Judge Name HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
Bench
  • HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
  • HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
Precedent Value Binding
Overrules / Affirms Affirms established principle that delegated legislation takes effect only on Gazette publication
Type of Law Delegated legislation / Administrative law / Foreign trade regulation
Questions of Law
  • Whether “date of this Notification” in para 2 of DGFT Notification No.38/2015-2020 can be any date other than its Gazette publication date
  • Whether an unpublished Notification can bind importers
Ratio Decidendi

The FT(D&R) Act mandates that any order regulating imports must be published in the Official Gazette to acquire the force of law. Delegated legislation binds only upon such publication; an upload or announcement does not suffice. Consequently, the expression “date of this Notification” in para 2 must mean the date it appeared in the Gazette. This preserves commercial certainty and the rule of law.

Judgments Relied Upon
  • B.K. Srinivasan & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors. (1987) 1 SCC 658
  • Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Deputy Land Acquisition Officer & Anr. (1962) 1 SCR 676
  • Gulf Goans Hotels Co. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. (2014) 10 SCC 673
  • Union of India v. G.S. Chatha Rice Mills & Anr. (2021) 2 SCC 209
Logic / Jurisprudence / Authorities Relied Upon by the Court

The constitutional and statutory requirement that delegated legislation be promulgated by Official Gazette publication; the Rule of Law principle that laws must be accessible and knowable; strict compliance with parent-statute publication modes.

Facts as Summarised by the Court

Importers opened irrevocable letters of credit on 05 Feb 2016. DGFT uploaded MIP Notification on 05 Feb 2016, but it appeared in the Gazette only on 11 Feb 2016. High Court held upload sufficed to bind importers; petitioners challenged applicability to pre-Gazette LCs under FTP para 1.05(b).

Practical Impact

Category Impact
Binding On All subordinate courts
Persuasive For Other High Courts, tribunals
Follows
  • B.K. Srinivasan & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
  • Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Deputy Land Acquisition Officer & Anr.

What’s New / What Lawyers Should Note

  • Delegated trade Notifications under Section 3 FT(D&R) Act bind only from the date of Official Gazette publication, not from administrative uploads or announcements.
  • “Date of this Notification” in para 2 refers exclusively to the Gazette date, ensuring transitional import benefits apply to LCs opened before that date.
  • Confirms that para 1.05(b) FTP transitional protection is integral to Notification para 2 and cannot be denied on upload-date theories.
  • Reinforces the necessity of checking Gazette publication dates when advising on time-sensitive import restrictions.

Summary of Legal Reasoning

  1. Statutory Mandate: Section 3 FT(D&R) Act requires that import/export regulations be made by order published in the Official Gazette.
  2. Precedents on Promulgation: Decisions (Johnson v Sargant; Harla v State; B.K. Srinivasan; Gulf Goans; Chatha Rice Mills) establish that delegated legislation is effective only upon its prescribed mode of publication.
  3. Nature of Delegated Legislation: Publication in Gazette ensures accessibility, notice, solemnity, and accountability—conditions precedent to enforceability.
  4. Fact-Specific Analysis: The MIP Notification uploaded on 05 Feb 2016 but only gazetted on 11 Feb 2016; upload alone could not bind stakeholders.
  5. Interpretation of Para 2: “Date of this Notification” must mean the Gazette date; hence LCs opened before 11 Feb 2016 qualify for FTP para 1.05(b) protection.
  6. Outcome: High Court order reversed; transitional exemption applies; MIP cannot be imposed on pre-Gazette LCs.

Arguments by the Parties

Petitioner (Importers)

  • Notification published on 11 Feb 2016, so pre-publication LCs (05 Feb 2016) fall under FTP para 1.05(b) transitional protection.
  • “Date of this Notification” must be Gazette date; administrative upload is not enforceable law.

Respondent (Union of India & DGFT)

  • Notification takes effect on 11 Feb 2016, but para 2 benefit is restricted to LCs entered before 05 Feb 2016, the static “date of Notification.”
  • Executive practice allows different efficacy dates; FTP registration condition is procedural and does not conflict.

Factual Background

Private companies importing specified steel products contracted with foreign exporters and opened irrevocable letters of credit on 05 Feb 2016. On the same day DGFT uploaded a Notification imposing Minimum Import Prices, which was published in the Official Gazette on 11 Feb 2016. The importers challenged the application of MIP to their pre-publication LCs, relying on the transitional protection in FTP para 1.05(b). The Delhi High Court upheld the Notification as binding from the upload date; appellants appealed.

Statutory Analysis

  • Section 3, FT(D&R) Act: Empowers Central Government to regulate imports/exports by order published in the Official Gazette.
  • Notification No.38/2015–20 (05 Feb 2016):
    • Introduced MIP on steel items, valid six months from date of notification “or until further orders.”
    • Para 2: exempts imports under LCs entered before “date of this Notification,” subject to FTP para 1.05(b).
  • FTP para 1.05(b): Grants transitional protection to freely permitted imports if LCs were opened before the imposition date and registered within 15 days with Regional Authority.

Alert Indicators

  • ✔ Precedent Followed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

No comments to show.