Does “date of this Notification” in a DGFT Notification mean the Gazette publication date or the online upload date?

 

Summary

Category Data
Court Supreme Court of India
Case Number C.A. No.-000438-000438 – 2026
Diary Number 2376/2019
Judge Name HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
Bench

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

Precedent Value Binding on all courts and authorities dealing with delegated legislation
Overrules / Affirms Affirms Supreme Court precedents on publication; overrules Delhi High Court’s decision
Type of Law Administrative law; delegated legislation; foreign trade regulation
Questions of Law
  • Interpretation of “date of this Notification” in para 2 of DGFT Notification No. 38/2015-20
  • Enforceability of delegated legislation prior to Gazette publication
  • Scope of FTP para 1.05(b) transitional protection
Ratio Decidendi
  1. A delegated legislative instrument under Section 3 of the FT(D&R) Act binds only from its publication in the Official Gazette.
  2. Publication in the Gazette is a condition precedent and cannot be replaced by online upload.
  3. “Date of this Notification” must mean the Gazette publication date (11 Feb 2016), not the upload date (5 Feb 2016).
  4. Importers who opened irrevocable letters of credit before 11 Feb 2016 and complied with FTP para 1.05(b) are entitled to transitional protection.
  5. Strict compliance with legislative-mandated modes of promulgation safeguards legal certainty and the rule of law.
Judgments Relied Upon
  • B.K. Srinivasan & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors., (1987) 1 SCC 658
  • Raja Harish Chandra Raj Singh v. Deputy Land Acquisition Officer, (1962) 1 SCR 676
  • Johnson v. Sargant & Sons, (1918) 1 KB 101
  • Harla v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1951 SC 936
  • Gulf Goans Hotels Co. Ltd. v. Union of India, (2014) 10 SCC 673
  • Union of India v. G.S. Chatha Rice Mills, (2021) 2 SCC 209
  • Nabha Power Ltd. v. Punjab State Power Corp. Ltd., (2025) 5 SCC 353
Logic / Jurisprudence / Authorities Relied Upon by the Court
  • Section 3 FT(D&R) Act requires “Order published in the Official Gazette.”
  • Delegated legislation must be promulgated by statutory mode to bind citizens.
  • Natural justice and rule of law demand accessible promulgation.
  • Publication in Gazette transforms executive intention into enforceable law.
  • Online uploads lack the solemnity and notice function of Gazette publication.
Facts as Summarised by the Court
  • Appellants (steel importers) contracted and opened letters of credit on 5 Feb 2016 for imports of steel products.
  • DGFT uploaded Notification No. 38/2015-20 imposing Minimum Import Price (MIP) on 5 Feb 2016, “to be published in the Gazette.”
  • Official Gazette publication occurred on 11 Feb 2016.
  • Appellants registered L/Cs under FTP para 1.05(b) on 8 Feb 2016 seeking transitional protection.
  • Delhi High Court held Notification effective from Gazette date but applied L/C cut-off as upload date and dismissed writ petitions.

Practical Impact

Category Impact
Binding On All subordinate courts, tribunals and executive authorities
Persuasive For High Courts and administrative bodies in interpreting delegated legislation promulgation requirements
Overrules Delhi High Court’s Common Order dated 21.12.2018 in batch of writ petitions challenging DGFT Notification No. 38/2015-20
Follows Supreme Court precedents on publication of delegated legislation (e.g., B.K. Srinivasan, Gulf Goans Hotels)

What’s New / What Lawyers Should Note

  • Gazette publication is a non-negotiable condition precedent for enforceability of delegated legislation under the FT(D&R) Act.
  • Online upload of a Notification does not confer legal force or start statutory timelines.
  • Transitional protection under FTP para 1.05(b) applies to letters of credit opened before the Gazette publication date.
  • This ruling can be cited to challenge any DGFT Notification or similar subordinate legislation enforced prior to Gazette notification.
  • Reinforces strict adherence to legislative-mandated modes of promulgation to uphold legal certainty.

Summary of Legal Reasoning

  1. Statutory Mandate: Section 3 FT(D&R) Act requires orders regulating imports/exports to be “published in the Official Gazette.”
  2. Promulgation Principle: Delegated legislation binds only after statutory mode of publication—publication ensures notice and accountability.
  3. Precedent Survey: Cited Johnson v. Sargant & Sons and Harla (1951) on natural justice/promulgation; B.K. Srinivasan (1987) and Gulf Goans Hotels (2014) on strict compliance.
  4. Interpretation of “date of this Notification”: Since Gazette publication is the birth of delegated legislation, “date of this Notification” must be 11 Feb 2016.
  5. Transitional Protection: Para 2 of DGFT Notification incorporates FTP para 1.05(b); L/Cs opened before 11 Feb 2016 qualify for exemption from MIP.

Arguments by the Parties

Petitioner (Importers):

  • The Notification acquired force only on Gazette publication (11 Feb 2016).
  • “Date of this Notification” must be the publication date; L/Cs opened on 5 Feb 2016 thus fall before the effective date.
  • FTP para 1.05(b) protects imports under L/Cs opened prior to effective date.

Respondent (Union of India):

  • Notification, once uploaded on DGFT website, should be treated as its operative date (5 Feb 2016).
  • The expression “date of Notification” is static at the upload date.
  • Even if Gazette date is effective date, para 1.05(b) registration requirement is procedural and does not affect substantive restriction.
  • In case of conflict between policy and statute, Notification prevails over FTP.

Factual Background

Private steel importers entered into sale contracts and opened irrevocable letters of credit on 5 Feb 2016 for steel products. On the same day, DGFT uploaded a Notification imposing Minimum Import Price on specified steel items, with an endorsement “to be published in the Gazette.” The Notification appeared in the Official Gazette on 11 Feb 2016. Appellants registered their L/Cs under FTP para 1.05(b) on 8 Feb 2016 and challenged application of MIP to their pre-publication L/Cs before the Delhi High Court.

Statutory Analysis

  • FT(D&R) Act, 1992, Section 3: Empowers Central Government to regulate imports/exports by orders published in the Gazette.
  • FTP para 1.05(b): Grants transitional protection for freely permitted imports subsequently restricted, provided L/Cs were opened before restriction and registered within 15 days.
  • DGFT Notification No. 38/2015-20 (5 Feb 2016): Introduced MIP on steel imports; para 2 exempts imports under L/Cs entered before “date of this Notification” subject to FTP para 1.05(b).
  • Key Interpretation: “Date of this Notification” = Gazette publication date (11 Feb 2016); Gazette publication is the trigger for restrictions and transitional protection.

Dissenting / Concurring Opinion Summary

No separate dissenting or concurring opinions; the bench unanimously held Gazette publication as the operative date for delegated legislation under the FT(D&R) Act.

Procedural Innovations

No new procedural guidelines or innovations were issued; the decision reaffirms existing requirements for promulgation of delegated legislation.

Alert Indicators

  • ✔ Precedent Followed – Affirms established principles on statutory publication of delegated legislation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments

No comments to show.