The High Court for the State of Telangana disposed of CRP No.2241 of 2025 without awarding costs, addressing no substantive legal issues nor altering existing precedent; the judgment carries no binding precedential value and functions only as a disposition on facts, offering no new clarification or change for the wider legal community.
Summary
| Category | Data |
|---|---|
| Case Name | CRP/2241/2025 of Smt. Mumtaz Jahan Vs Mohammed Shafi |
| CNR | HBHC010355482025 |
| Date of Registration | 04-07-2025 |
| Decision Date | 31-10-2025 |
| Disposal Nature | DISPOSED OF NO COSTS |
| Judgment Author | P. SAM KOSHY |
| Court | High Court for State of Telangana |
| Precedent Value | Not precedential; disposed on facts; no substantive legal principle decided. |
| Bench | Single Judge (P. SAM KOSHY) |
Practical Impact
| Category | Impact |
|---|---|
| Binding On | None. No binding legal principle laid down. |
| Persuasive For | None. No persuasive or ratio decidendi established for reference. |
What’s New / What Lawyers Should Note
- The judgment merely disposes of the civil revision petition without costs and offers no legal reasoning or principle.
- No change, clarification, or new guidance for lawyers or lower courts arises from this judgment.
- The case should not be cited for any authoritative legal position, precedent, or principle.
Summary of Legal Reasoning
- The court issued an order disposing of the civil revision petition with no costs.
- No reasoning, legal principles, statute interpretation, or reliance on prior judgments is recorded in the available order.
- No ratio decidendi or legal proposition has been advanced or clarified.
- The order relates solely to the disposition of the particular parties’ cause.
Factual Background
- The matter was a civil revision petition (CRP No.2241 of 2025) between Smt. Mumtaz Jahan and Mohammed Shafi before the High Court for the State of Telangana.
- The judgment/order sheet notes only the appearance of counsel for both sides.
- No further factual recitation, context, or background is provided in the available record.
Alert Indicators
- Precedent Followed – No new law, ratio, or overruling; the court has simply disposed of the petition as per ordinary procedure.