The High Court of Chhattisgarh reaffirms that only parties directly connected to the original proceedings (or their legal representatives) can
The court reaffirmed that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should not ordinarily be exercised when an adequate and efficacious alternative
The High Court of Chhattisgarh holds that, following Supreme Court precedent, the “pay and recover” principle applies even in motor
The High Court confirmed that when a petition is withdrawn after the impugned administrative order has already been passed and
The Andhra Pradesh High Court unequivocally holds that no departmental proceedings can be instituted in respect of events which occurred
Recovery of excess payments, when not caused by an employee’s misrepresentation or fault and made long ago or at the
A High Court judgment clarifies that dismissal of a writ petition as infructuous does not result in a substantive ruling
The Andhra Pradesh High Court reaffirms that appellate interference with an acquittal is justified only in cases of perversity or
Reaffirming the legal bar on recovery of excess salary where the employee is not at fault, this judgment applies and
The High Court held that extra-judicial confession is inherently a weak form of evidence and, absent strong corroboration, cannot form
The Chhattisgarh High Court, relying on the Supreme Court’s constitutional bench judgment, holds that no separate endorsement is needed for
The High Court of Chhattisgarh, interpreting Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, has held that where compensation for temporary