Bombay High Court holds that a state or its instrumentality cannot challenge enhanced compensation in some land acquisition matters while
The Bombay High Court reiterates that government or its instrumentalities cannot “pick and choose” which similar compensation awards to appeal
The Bombay High Court has held that the State or its instrumentalities cannot adopt a “pick and choose” approach in
The Bombay High Court, reaffirming settled law, held that State instrumentalities cannot adopt a pick-and-choose approach by accepting enhanced compensation
The Bombay High Court reaffirmed that claimants in land acquisition disputes may be entitled to receive compensation higher than what
The Madras High Court reaffirmed that an accused’s absence from trial cannot be held against them when they were in
The Jharkhand High Court reaffirmed that when the complainant and victim are declared hostile due to compromise between the parties,
The Bombay High Court reiterates that acquiring authorities cannot selectively appeal enhanced land compensation awards when similar awards are accepted
The Bombay High Court has held that the acquiring authority (State or its instrumentalities) cannot adopt a “pick and choose”
The Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that land acquisition authorities cannot adopt discriminatory “pick and choose” tactics in appeals—if compensation
The Bombay High Court has reaffirmed existing Supreme Court precedent that prohibits discriminatory appeals by the State (or its instrumentalities)
The Bombay High Court holds that claimants are entitled to the full compensation to which they are legally entitled, even